文章《你打算完成什么目的》（译自tworags的BOND18博客）

silva520mm · 发表于 2010-9-25 08:52:47

这篇稍微抽象些，是BOND18系列的第三篇《What're you trying to accomplish？》

你打算完成什么目的？

我的这篇文章看起来和GOBbo的文章《不要说你的下注是为了获得信息》有点相似，但是这篇文章
会提到一些他文章中没有的概念。

我通常会发一些牌局，这些牌局给人的回应就是：“你准备在这里做什么？”我所犯的一个通常错
误就是我在翻牌后游戏时没有通过我的决定去思考，并且没有理解我行动的真正动机。

这里有一个基本的概念：每当你在一手牌中（除了弃牌）做出一个行动时你都需要知道你需要通过
这个行动去完成一个什么样的目的。

一个例子，你在游戏中看到有人总是在翻牌圈下注，然后当他们被再加注时，他们不知道该做什么
。如果你准备做一个下注，你的做法是否属于以下几种之一：
A 纯咋唬
B 半咋唬
C 价值下注并希望被再加注
D 价值下注并且会面对再加注弃牌

大多数时间，你的价值下注希望被对手再加注，但是这里有一点注意，尤其是在河牌的价值下注并
且弃牌给一个再加注是一个非常合理的玩法。

如果你做了一个下注，但是面对对手的再加注无所适从，不知道该跟注还是弃牌，那么你就去死吧
，因为你对你自己的下注都没有一个明确的目的。

你对你的每个行动都应该有一个计划。你决定要玩，之后你的对手做出了一个你没有预料到的反应，
好好考虑下你的决定，但是，因为大多扑克比赛都是短筹码的，你的许多决定，尤其是翻牌前的决
定，都应该更为直白的好。当你在小盲位置对一个只有15个大盲注筹码量的大盲位置玩家加注时，
当他全押了，你不应当出现艰难的决定。你应当能够预料到一个如此筹码量的玩家在这里对你全押
应该比较平常，你应该根据这个情况来做出一个合适的跟注范围。

为了信息而下注或加注很难是一个可行的选择，因为下注的类型无非就是咋唬或者价值下注，有很
多其他的方式通过你的手牌去获得信息，没有必要为了一个简单的目的去浪费大量的筹码。我将在
后面的文章介绍下读牌。

如果你打算用简单的方式练习这个概念，花几天时间玩上几个桌子以便你有时间去做决定。每当你
要做一个不确信的决定时，坐下来问问你自己：“我要通过这个决定完成一个什么样的目的？”这
听起来像是一个跛脚的建议，但是我保证这可以帮助你思考你正在做什么。

原文如下：

This post will seem a little repetitive of some of the things Gobbo covered in his ‘Stop saying you’re betting for information!’ thread but I’ll also be hitting on some concepts he didn’t go over.
I used to post a lot of hands where people’s basic response would basiCALLy be “What are you trying to do here?” The common mistake I was making in my post FLOP play, is I wasn’t thinking through my decisions and understanding my motivation for my actions.
Here’s the basic concept: Every time you make an action in a poker hand (outside folding) you need to know what you’re trying to accomplish by taking that action.
For example, one play you see people making all of the time is raising on the flop, then when they get reraised tanking forever because they don’t know what to do. If you’re going to raise a spot like this you need to know whether you’re doing it as
A. a pure bluff
B. a semi bluff
C. a value raise that hopes to get reraised
D. a value raise that will fold to a reraise.
Most of the time, if you’re value raising it should be hopes of getting reraised, but there are spots, especially on the river, where raising for value but folding to a reraise is the most appropriate play.
If you make a bet, then realize you have no idea whether you want villain to call or fold, you’ve **ed up because you’re bet doesn’t have a clear purpose.
You need to have a plan for every action. It’s okay to make a play, then have your opponent react in a way you didn’t anticipate and think over your decision, but because so much of tournament poker is at a short stack a lot of your decisions, especially pre flop, should be pretty straight forward. When you raise in the small blind vs a player in the BB who has 15 BB’s, you shouldn’t have a tough decision when he shoves. You should be able to anticipate that a player at this stack will be shoving somewhat often on you and act accordingly by calling with an appropriate range.
The bet/raise for information is rarely a viable option because bets should fall into the category of bluff or value bet. There are other ways to discern the information given to you in a hand than spewing chips for simply that purpose. I’ll get into that a little more with the next segment about hand reading.
If you want to practice this concept the easy way, play only a couple tables for a few days so that you have time to make your decision. Then, every time you have a decision that isn’t incredibly obvious sit back and ask yourself “What am I trying to accomplish with this hand?” It sounds like a sort of lame suggestion, but I promise it will help to think over what you’re doing.