- 竞技币
- 302
- 威望
- 0
- 经验值
- 257
- 竞技币
- 302
- 威望
- 0
- 经验值
- 257
- 注册时间
- 2013-8-11
- 最后登录
- 2013-11-17
|
艾伦很帅气 发表于 2013-9-8 07:38 - ~ I2 k+ L& K6 J5 f* k$ r
Can you talk about the rake in low stakes PLO?And also the difference between PLO50 and PLO100?
4 g; z5 |& V1 N& Y" pObviously the rake is a far more important factor in low stakes games, but for ultra mirco stakes, ipoker capped the rake at $1, $3 for mid-level stakes, and $4 for high.. R9 Q2 P1 m( g
2 H# t% L# `2 oNot sure if you can beat the rake if you are playing ultra mirco stakes, but the idea of playing such low stakes is to learn the mechanics of the game, so we can afford to take a slight negative ev hit in the process. Rakes becomes less important the higher you play, as if we play 2/4, and take down a 600 pot, the rake is capped at $3, that's just half of one precent of the pot. Even without a good RB programme, such rakes are very beatable, but not sure why anyone would want to play online poker without RB.
. C( F% {" C0 Z1 I
q. _8 O4 q+ a6 pNot played 0.25/0.50 for a long while now, but I cant see it being any easier than 0.50/1 or even 1/2. In my experince, the standard doesn't really improve much until we get to 10/20, but even that might be a misread on my part, as I have not logged enough hands at that level, it being somewhat too expensive for my roll. I can say for sure that, at least in ipoker, there isn't much difference in standard between 1/2 to 3/6.* C" K, [$ O: D+ }
) c: e" e4 C) a- D' W/ k B
I am not sure how many hands you have played at plo 25 and plo 50, but bearing in mind that plo being a very swingy game, might you not be just running bad at plo50, and running good at plo25, giving you the impression that one is easier than the other? Rake would be a factor, but unless you are paying capped rakes often (lots of big pots) at plo25, I can't see it making a huge difference at plo25 and plo50 |
|